The Bones of Editing
Thursday, May 26, 2011
In the last few weeks, Advent hired an editor, Sandra Judd, for refining and polishing CWM. She will focus on stylistic editing and copyediting. I've seen a short sample from her already, and I know she'll improve the novel's quality significantly. I found her service here at Book Editing Associates. I recommend that you check out these listings if you ever need an editor.
If you're serious about publishing and selling a book, getting a good editor is vital. Sure, you can throw up a book on Amazon without any editing at all (more on that on a later post), but if you're wanting it to be good, you have no excuse not to have a good editor. It's not just about making sure you spelled all your words correctly (believe me, it's surprising how poorly proofread some self-publishde work is), but it's about removing obstacles in the reader's path for them to connect with your work and making your work shine so your story is worth reading in itself.
That last sentence needs help. Let's make it better.
Before we change anything, we need to understand what's broken. For a cracked femur, bandages may be an easy fix, but resetting the bone is necessary for healing.
The most obvious problem is the misspelling of "self-published." That's easy enough to see, but it's not really important right now. Dig deeper.
The sentence is awkward, long, and hard to follow. It's convoluted and has too much filler, which clouds its message. What is its message? Let's go deeper.
Parsing through the sentence, we can find the basic message: Editing polishes, clarifies, and enriches your content. That's the core, the bedrock of the sentence. At this foundational level, the sentence is good. The bone's not broken, just out of joint.
These three levels can be summed up as the basic cycle of editing. Special thanks to Sandra for breaking these down for me in an email she wrote.
Copyediting - Correcting grammar, spelling, and minor style issues. Polish.
Stylistic editing - Reforming sentence construction, improving diction, eliminating filler, specifying. Clarification.
Substantive editing - Big picture suggestions, reworking of characters and plots, improving conflict. Enrichment.
Generally, the editing process starts with substantive editing and ends with copyediting. No reason to make cosmetic changes to something if you haven't fixed it from falling apart first.
Let's edit that earlier sentence.
It's not just about making sure you spelled all your words correctly (believe me, it's surprising how poorly proofread some self-publishde work is), but it's about removing obstacles in the reader's path for them to connect with your work and making your work shine so your story is worth reading in itself.
To . . .
More than correcting spelling and grammar, editing removes obstacles, such as jargon, filler, and convoluted sentence structure, which come between your reader and your story. Editing also refines the core elements of the story--characters, plot, environment, and theme--sculpting them until they are worthy of being told.
This is a complete, thorough edit. Everything except the core meaning has changed. Sometimes it is necessary to drop something passable for something much better. I know the edited example could use even more work (I would like it to be shorter and more personal). And then, of course, a lot of this is subjective, and you can't spend forever editing without moving on to the next thing.
Can you make a better edit?